How do children remember about a visit to a church or cathedral? Does the answer depend upon adults design the questions? Insights might be gained from this study based on a visit to a museum:
One to two days later, the amount of information recalled by the children depended to a large degree on how they were tested. Asked to freely recall the visit, the children remembered a significant amount of factual and trivial, “narrative” information, uttering an average of ten factual clauses. Crucially, this amount of factual recall doubled when they were allowed to draw at the same time as they recounted the day’s events. By contrast, the children performed relatively poorly when given a traditional comprehension test in the form of 12 questions.
A second study largely replicated these findings with a second group of children who were tested on their memory for the museum visit after seven months. The amount of information they recalled remained substantial but was reduced, as you’d expect after a longer delay. Also, the benefit of drawing now only affected recall of narrative information, not facts.
Why the difference in performance between free recall and the comprehension test? Analysis of the content of the children’s free recall revealed that they tended to remember facts that were not tapped by the traditional comprehension test, which had of course been devised by adults. This tallies with previous research showing that children and adults tend to focus on different aspects of the same events.
Read it all.
Do these findings change the way you do Christian formation, or the way you assess your success in teaching?
Thanks to Tyler Cowen for the pointer. He observes, “The funny thing, I think, is that they consider this a study of children rather than of human beings.”